College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Obama’s healthcare plan has benefits, drawbacks

By Jill Hayes, Anchor Staff Writer

|

Published: Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, September 15, 2009

When Barack Obama was elected president, he made substantial promises about changing America for the better. One of his points of interest was healthcare, and his current plan is to reform the healthcare system, promote scientific and technological advancements and improve preventative care.
On his Web site, barackobama.com, Obama says, “Making sure every American has access to high quality health care is one of the most important challenges of our time. The number of uninsured Americans is growing, premiums are skyrocketing, and more people are being denied coverage every day. A moral imperative by any measure, a better system is also essential to rebuilding our economy – we want to make health insurance work for people and businesses, not just insurance and drug companies.”
The administration believes that comprehensive health reform should reduce both long term and short term rises in healthcare costs for businesses and government, protect families from declaring bankruptcy or debt due to healthcare costs, guarantee people a choice in who their doctor is, invest in wellness and prevention, improve the quality of care, guarantee affordable health coverage for all citizens, maintain coverage even if you lose your job, and end barriers to coverage for those with pre-existing medical conditions.
Obama’s health care plan is a nationalized health insurance plan in which doctors, hospitals and the healthcare are delivery system would be under the control of the federal government. Right now, health insurance is unobtainable for an estimated 43 million Americans. Many believe that the solution to this problem is a nationalized health plan, but every plan has its pros and cons.
Nationalized health insurance could lower the cost of U.S. made consumer products; the result of this is that products from countries that have a nationalized health insurance plan cost less. The president’s plan could also be well-suited for employees. The lower cost of American-made products would help the nation compete in global trade which, results in keeping more jobs at home. Since this plan provides employer-provided health insurance, workers would have the ability to switch jobs to find one they actually enjoy as opposed to staying in a job they hate.
However, studies show that the U.S. has better quality in its healthcare than any other nation, including those with nationalized health insurance. In taking on this healthcare plan, Americans do run the risk of losing some of that high quality healthcare.
A study conducted by the American Consumer Institute showed that Americans are split on their opinions about this plan; 43 percent favor this plan while 50 percent don’t. The same survey also shows that Democrats are more likely to support a nationalized health plan than Republicans. But regardless of the split opinions, Obama and his administration continue to move forward with applying this plan.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

mike618
Tue Dec 8 2009 21:35
i love it. your gona get me an A on my speech
sadasfasf
Tue Nov 17 2009 12:03
i dont kno wut to comment about but i wanted to be the fourth
Robert Reneaud
Tue Sep 15 2009 22:21
I Agree with Gayle, and that is part of the reason I live in the Netherlands and not the US. Although, in Iowa, where I come from, All children are guaranteed health coverage, adults are not unless they can afford to pay an arm and a leg. If I stayed, it would have been so hard for me to even get health insurance because of preexisting health problems. At first I had it because I was able to continue my policy from John Deere after I reached the age of independence, but then lost it because I could not maintain a job, which meant that I had to seek out other insurance which should have been cheap for young healthy people, but impossible for me to get due to my illness. In the Netherlands, this is not possible because health insurance is... 1st of all, a right, and 2nd a requirement, and 3rd because of governmental regulations, affordable. And that is with private insurance.... Yes insurance companies can compete, there is no reason it needs to be so expensive.
Gayle
Tue Sep 15 2009 20:09
Why do you say that our system is the best in the world when we are ranked at 37th? If you look at people who HAVE insurance, we do a well as other countries. But why do we think it's OK to leave so many without insurance? It could happen to any one of us. Just because we're taken care of doesn't mean we should turn our backs on so many.
We can expect vigorous opposition from those who are getting rich in this system. See this week's Newsweek - 22,000 Americans a year are dying because they lack insurance and aren't getting treatment. This is better than any other nation? I don't think so.
RJ Alveriz
Tue Sep 15 2009 19:52
i dont kno wut to comment about but i wanted to be the first






log out