College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Media barred from emergency Finance meeting

Published: Thursday, February 25, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 2, 2010 18:03

Anchor editor-in-chief, Anchor TV reporter and WXIN reporter all told to leave before a “private” Finance Commission meeting convened and escorted out by Campus Police, per order of SCG treasurer.

Last Wednesday, Anchor Editor-in-Chief Kameron Spaulding, pen and pad of paper in hand, sat in Parliament Chambers, Room 307 of the Student Union, with the intent of sitting in on an emergency meeting of the Finance Commission. Twenty minutes later he was escorted from the building by Campus Police while Student Community Government, Inc. Treasurer Christopher Kelly chaired the Finance Commission in an executive session.
This Free Period emergency meeting was called on Tuesday afternoon shortly after the latest edition of The Anchor newspaper, which included tentative 2010-2011 budget figures, hit newsstands around campus. Emergency meetings are rare for the Finance Commission, having taken place just a handful of times during the last three years.
Spaulding was not the only member of the media to be removed from the meeting Wednesday afternoon. WXIN News Director Andrew Augustus attempted to set up equipment to broadcast the Finance meeting live on the air, but was told that he could not do so by Kelly.
“He told me to pack up the equipment and get out while waving the “Robert’s Rules of Order” book in the air,” Augustus said.
Anchor TV also had a videographer, Thomas Lima, in the room, whose video was provided to and can be found on The Anchor’s Web site, www.anchorweb.org.
When Kelly entered the room, he told Lima and Spaulding to leave. Spaulding responded that he did not need to leave until the meeting had entered executive session.
Kelly responded, “The chair can begin their committee’s meeting in executive session according to “Robert’s Rules of Order.”” He added that “Robert’s Rules of Order” supersede the By-Laws of SCG on this matter.
Upon review of the SCG By-Laws, however, this statement was proved to be false. The By-Laws state, in Article 14.7, “Parliament and committee and commission meetings shall be governed by “Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised” in all situations not otherwise provided for in these By-Laws,” the opposite of the treasurer’s assertion.
According to a document explaining Rhode Island’s Open Meetings Laws, “…before a public body can hold a meeting closed to the public, there must be an affirmative vote of the majority of its members to convene in a closed session, by open call.”
When Spaulding pointed this out and refused to leave, Treasurer Kelly asked for a member of Finance to “escort him” out of the room. Finance Member Diamonte Tavolaro then went to the door closest to Spaulding and told him to leave.
Spaulding again replied that he would not leave until the meeting had started and a vote was taken to enter executive session.
In response, Kelly used a fellow Finance member’s cellular phone to call Campus Police to ask them to remove him from the meeting.
When Campus Police arrived, Kelly explained that he was having “a private meeting,” and that he would like the officer to remove the reporters from the chamber.
The officer then asked Spaulding why he refused to leave, to which he replied, “this is a student government meeting and, as such, it cannot begin in executive session, and I’m here to cover the meeting until that happens.”
An unruly debate that included Kelly, Spaulding and several Finance members then ensued over the use of executive session. After several minutes, the Campus Police officer requested that Kelly begin the meeting and then motion for executive session so that the reporters in attendance would leave. A second Campus Police officer, also responding to the call, entered the room at this time.
In response, Kelly began the meeting and the roll was called. Then, a motion was made to enter executive session, according to the advice of the attending Campus Police officer. As soon as the motion was made, Spaulding and Lima left the room.
The entire debate, which took place before the meeting was called to order, drew the attention of attendees at an event across the hall in the Student Union Ballroom. President Nancy Carriuolo was giving her annual State of the College Address to administration, faculty, staff and students, an event that was also covered by Anchor TV via a live, televised broadcast and an Anchor reporter.
The reason stated by the treasurer for entering executive session once the meeting was called to order was “disciplinary actions.”
On the issue of committees taking disciplinary actions, “Robert’s Rules of Order, Newly Revised, 10th Edition,” which is the manual that governs SCG meetings, states, “A committee has no power to punish its members for disorder or other improper conduct related to its proceedings…,” leaving Kelly’s reasoning for the commission to enter executive session questionable, as only Parliament has authority in disciplinary matters.
Lima, who said he has taped hundreds of Tiverton School Committee and other government meetings for public access television, said that last Wednesday’s events were a first for him.
“I’ve been taping meetings for six years, and I’ve never seen a committee try to go into executive session like that before,” Lima said. “It was frustrating and disappointing to see student government operate in this manner.”
Lima, younger brother of Speaker of Parliament Nicholas Lima, served on both Parliament and Finance last year.
As the remainder of the meeting was held in executive session, no knowledge of the proceedings is known at this time. The only way the minutes of the meeting can become public is if a majority vote by Parliament is taken to unseal the minutes. A number of Parliament members, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of repercussions, have told The Anchor that they will ask for the minutes to be unsealed at this week’s regular meeting, scheduled for March 3 at 7 p.m. in Student Union 307.


Recommended: Articles that may interest you

22 comments

Andrew M
Sat Feb 27 2010 23:37
In response to Ingrid, I completely agree except on one point: It's He-Who-Should-Not-Be-Named.

-Andrew M
Opinions Editor

Ingrid Stanford
Fri Feb 26 2010 22:19
My name is Ingrid. I think SCG is good, but we need reform. We need to oust those who oppose freedom of expression and I vow that I will oust those who oppose our rights. For the good will of all those who go to Rhode Island College I will vow to oust those who oppose us. Rock On Kameron, Lord Voldemort will burn.
Kameron Spaulding
Fri Feb 26 2010 16:13
As the Editor-In-Chief I am gald to see so many people are reading, and no matter what one poster said by reaction I assume caring about what is in The Anchor. I will stay out of any debate of motive or all of that as a reporter it is not my place, my only hope is that we can continue to inform the students at RIC about what is going on here on campus. Thank You and enjoy your reading of the Anchor.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:50
I'm sure the "best interest of the groups" was considered when budgets were slashed.... what kind of sense does that make? I'm sure finance gave these clubs NO heads up on what they were going to cut when they came in during the hearings and waited until they got out of the room. What's the point of having the hearings in the first place? They didn't even ask my club any questions!!! They just waited till we left and then cut our budget. we left there thinking we were in good shape because they didn't ask us anything. that's underhanded and WRONG.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:50
Did you people who are commenting even read this article? This isn't about whether it was right or wrong to publish the budgets. It's about whether the Finance Commission had the right to kick Kameron, Andrew, and Thomas out of the meeting. And at the point when they attempted to do so and called Campus Police, they did not have that right. Any student can go to ANY Finance or SCG meeting at any time. It is your right as a student, as well as falling under Rhode Island State laws (meetings must be public). The only way a meeting may become closed door is if the commission votes to make it "Executive Session." At the time when Campus Police were called, the meeting hadn't even been called to order yet, and a meeting can NOT be in executive session from the moment the gavel hits the table. As soon as executive session was called and voted for, the reporters in question left promptly without any argument whatsoever. Had Treasurer Kelly simply called the meeting to order and called executive session in the first place there would have been no issues or controversy. As it stands, he seems to have let the power get to his head.

Well done to all the media for continuing to report with grace under pressure. If only the national media would be as honest and forthright with information as our campus media is, we might be in better shape as a country. (Or there'd be anarchy. Hard to say, really.)

Tom Lima
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:48
I have been taping government meetings for 6 years and served on the finance commission last year. I have never seen a committee or board call a meeting starting in executive session. There are allot of maters that come up in government that require the use of executive session but a town council or other government board can not just go into executive session for no publicly stated reason. The Tiverton School Committee has regularly scheduled Executive sessions at the start and end of each of their regular meeting, but the regular meeting is always convened first and then a motion is made to go into executive at which point the public and Tigers TV are given time to leave.

I don't see how finance can have tried to start in executive session and still have the transparency it needs in order to serve the student body and their activity fee money.

Christina
Fri Feb 26 2010 13:38
The information that appeared in the anchor last week really opened my eyes. I had no idea that so much money went through SCG. Isn't it funny that they never tell us where our money goes until the anchor prints the budgets.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 03:31
if anyone wants to know where money is going they could easily walk to student community government. why should scg advertise how much money they have control over? that's ridiculous. anyone at anytime can get the information. and if people want the rationale show up to the parliament meeting they have in april. maybe then you'd see that these people aren't ruthless. I'm sure they understand why there's panic... people just need to give it time. also, there's a public relations committee for scg, if anyone should be doing anything about this, its them. however, the vice president of scg, who chairs that committee, has failed to do anything about this. everyone has some blame, but i really feel like the members of the commission, while doing what they felt was best, all had guidance from the treasurer. and i doubt that the treasurer plans on destroying scg or any student org. so really, the best interest of the groups must've been considered.
Kyle P.
Fri Feb 26 2010 02:51
its so stupid for people to blame the Anchor for "causing" outrage. like I commented on another article, news articles DONT cause outrage - budget cuts do!!! people don't get mad at the Providence Journal when union jobs are cut by the governor, they get mad at the governor!! this is no different. stop blaming the press for actually covering campus news, its the ONLY reason why they are there. how can you be that ignorant of the role of the media, even on a college campus??
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 02:42
And why does no one know the logic behind the cuts? No one was told before the budget hearings that every club was going into a firestorm of cuts. Maybe if the Finance Commission and its members would speak up, instead of hiding behind policies and closed door meetings, people wouldn't be so outraged.

Maybe that's why The Anchor ran these stories. Not to outrage people, but to force their elected representatives - who, by the way, control over 1 million of the student's money, real money - to actually reveal their motives publicly. Do you really believe that the "official" cuts that will be released by SCG are going to explain the rationale behind them? Of course not. They never do. The rational was to cut for the sake of cutting. Some clubs have been put back BELOW their 1995 levels. That's insane!!!!

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 01:56
AGAIN, no one knows the logic behind the cuts. No one can make judgement on what the commission has done as right or wrong until the logic has been presented. From what I've seen Finance has said no maybe twice this year. And from the public record of minutes, it seems to me its because the clubs were breaking strict policies. Policies are black and white. The people on the commission are under the guidance of the treasurer. Maybe he's made mistakes. But people on Parliament elected him and appointed the commission members. And because no one knows the logic behind their decisions or the actual situation with most club budgets OTHER than the Finance Members, no one can question their ability to make decent decisions. Maybe they're all gluttons for punishment. All I know is I have friends on all sides of this. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but to accuse people of being unable to do a job when you don't know their reasoning is disrespectful to them and also to the Parliament members who appointed them.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 00:15
Never fails to astound me how heated up these student politicians get.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 23:49
There is nothing in the SCG By-Laws that state that budget hearings can only be attended by the clubs themselves, and no one else. Maybe this was an, but that's how it is. Feel free to stop by the SCG office and take a look at the SCG By-Laws and con oversite firm it for yourselves.

It sounds as if there is more to this story than we know right now. Why are budgets being cut? The student activity fee was increased recently, and SCG recently had state laws changed so that it could increase the amount of funds that are in escrow.

The Anchor should investigate what the current status of this years budget is. With attendance up, there should be more in the SCG Inc's accounts than in recent years. Why the sudden decreases? It sounds like the Finance members are either out of touch with the current levels of activity of the student organizations, or there is something more serious to be worrying about that only the Treasurer and Finance know about. I could understand a freeze, but cuts... and for groups like LASO, and Habitat for Humanity? That just doesn't sound right.

By the way, the great stories that broke over the years, such as Watergate, Iran Contra, etc do not "respect" the process. There is no such thing as "respect" for something as arbitrary as budget hearings. What you do, as a journalist, is work within the frameworks of what the rules or the laws allow. Since there are none preventing these student journalists from covering these meetings, then I think they're doing their job - and with the fuss it seems to be causing, they are doing it well.

SCG Alumnus.
Thu Feb 25 2010 23:37
(This comment was also posted on the video page as well)

I'm someone who has served on the Finance Committee when I was a student. It disappoints me that the treasurer is acting in this manner. We (as in the Finance Committee I was a part of) used to take pride in the fact that Finance was there to help all organizations, as long as they asked. If you're doing your job, there's nothing to hide. If the Anchor, WXIN, Anchor-TV, NewsChannel 10, or CNN want to send someone in and cover the meeting, who cares? The only time you care is when you are up to something you shouldn't be.

Student parliament should take action to remove the treasurer and dismiss the Finance committee members who went along with these shenanigans.

As for those personally attacking those in the groups covering these meetings, you have no grounds to. The media clubs are doing their job. I only wish there was this much coverage of what Parliament and Finance was doing when I was a student. Despite my alumni status, I'm on campus regularly - and The Anchor is filled with interesting material to read, for the student that wants to take the next step from the apathetic norm that is usually the status quo for most.

It's also discouraging to see that rather than come up with a constructive reason on why the media groups should have not been there, they've instead taken the high road and tried to attack the character of the students covering the meeting and of the media groups themselves.

Wake up. This isn't the Student Council at your high school. It's a committee that controls and distributes hundreds of thousands of dollars of the Student Activity Fee. If you don't want to be in the spotlight, or be subject to campus media coverage, step down, get out of the way, and let those who actually have some respect for the committee and what it represents get in there and serve the students and the student organizations that they are accountable to.

not a finance member like everyone else posting here
Thu Feb 25 2010 20:15
i guess one of the "set procedures" that finance has to follow every year is cutting every clubs budget even though theres a record surplus...way to make student COMMUNITY life better....just so they can have the power to say no more often next year when clubs go in for routine things. why dont they add another 40 or 50 unessary policys. maybe then all of the clubs will have zeroed budgets, so finance can win the game! HIGH SCORE!!!
Concerned Community Member
Thu Feb 25 2010 17:05
I think the problem here is that people are giving credit to the Anchor for "revealing the truth". They're just trying to make a bigger problem for everyone else. Every year, without fail, someone from the Anchor has a problem with the way Finance or Student Community Government is running. And you cannot blame just the treasurer for everything, they act as a commission. They work together. Not one person made these decisions.

What no one seems to understand is that the logic behind the cuts has not been made clear. As of right now there has been commentary from ONE member of the commission. There is more than one person who saw to these budgets being cut. There must be justification for clubs getting budget cuts. They might not be using it effectively, if at all.

You guys need to open up your eyes and realize that in the long run, you've done nothing to better the community. As journalists, if you sought the truth you would have waited for final reports and would've been able to truly comment on the abilities of the Finance Commission, which includes members of your staff. Think before you write.

anchor cynic
Thu Feb 25 2010 15:24
anyone that has taken the time to look further into this than besides what the anchor is publishing would realize that finance has set procedures that they need to follow. these procedures have been in place for years, and yet THIS year the anchor decides to throw a wrench into these procedures, probably because this is they only kind of excitement they'll get this semester. people reading this article should do their own research on this matter, and not the half-assed publishing of the anchor.
Joe
Thu Feb 25 2010 15:14
Thats ridiculous, Santa Claus. If this happened at a House Finance meeting at the State House to the Journal and NBC 10, you wouldn't stop hearing about it for a month. In the context of campus governance, it is a major issue, and all students that benefit from the Student Activity Fee should be concerned about it, not trivialize it.
The Office Santa Claus
Thu Feb 25 2010 14:19
I love that this is what passes for a serious issue on campus nowadays. One day you'll all realize how trivial these debates and controversies really are.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 14:06
it is the media's responsibility to administer information to the community. Just because it was released a little prematurely doesn't mean anything. The finance commission does have an unenviable task, but instead of making everyone happy they made no one happy.






log out